-
Bifacial solar panel technology can generate between 5% and 30% more energy than single-sided panels under favorable conditions.
-
The cost of bifacial panels and installing them is typically higher than monofacial panels.
-
Most homeowners may see limited additional energy production from bifacial panels unless their installation environment supports strong reflected sunlight.
Standard solar panels are designed to gather and convert sunlight from the sky above them. But you can also buy panels with solar cells mounted on both sides of the panel known as bifacial solar panels. By taking advantage of both direct sunlight and the light that bounces off surfaces like concrete, white roofing, or sand, bifacial panels can produce higher electricity output and amplify the environmental benefits of solar systems.
The additional energy production occurs because reflected sunlight reaches the rear surface of the photovoltaic cells. Researchers at the National Laboratory of the Rockies report that bifacial modules can produce approximately 5% to 30% more electricity than comparable monofacial systems depending on surface reflectivity, mounting height, and system design.
They’re most commonly used in commercial solar installations, large-scale solar farms, or locations where reflective ground surfaces improve rear-side energy capture.
In this article, we’ll go over how bifacial panels work and how they differ from traditional solar technology. You’ll also learn about why they may not always justify the additional expense for residential systems.
PowerOutage.us tracks outages from 950+ utilities serving more than 200 million customers nationwide. Solar buyers can use this data to decide whether solar and battery backup improve resilience for a home.
How bifacial solar panels work
Bifacial solar panels generate electricity by capturing sunlight on both their front and rear surfaces, increasing overall energy production before the energy is converted for home use by a solar inverter.
The front side captures direct solar irradiance from the sun, while the rear side captures reflected light from the surrounding environment. This reflected light component is commonly called the albedo effect in solar engineering.
In simplified terms, solar panel power output is approximately proportional to the amount of sunlight hitting the cells:
Power output ≈ Panel efficiency x Solar irradiance x Panel area
For bifacial modules, the effective irradiance becomes:
Effective irradiance = Front irradiance + Rear irradiance
Rear irradiance depends largely on ground reflectivity, also called the albedo coefficient:
Rear irradiance ≈ Ground reflectivity x Incoming solar radiation
For example, snow-covered surfaces can reflect 60% to 90% of sunlight, while darker asphalt may reflect less than 10%. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration documents these reflectivity ranges in surface radiation studies.
Because bifacial panels can convert part of that reflected light into electricity, their total energy yield can increase when installed in favorable environments.
Structure and materials of dual-sided solar modules
There are a few key differences in how bifacial modules differ from standard solar panel construction. These include:
-
Translucent backsheet: Single-sided solar panels typically have an opaque backsheet behind the PV cell layer. Bifacial panels use a translucent backsheet or dual-glass design that allows them to collect light from both sides of the panels.
-
Specialized PV cells: The silicon PV cells used in dual-sided panels typically have a slightly different electrical architecture than those used in standard panels. These cells can be either monocrystalline or polycrystalline silicon and are engineered to allow light collection from both sides of the cell.
-
Frame: Bifacial solar panels are usually mounted higher off the surface than single-faced panels using specialized solar racking systems that allow more reflected light to reach the rear cells.
-
Rear glass: Many bifacial systems also use dual-glass construction, which can improve durability and reduce long-term moisture degradation according to the International Energy Agency PV Power Systems Programme (IEA PVPS). Other bifacial panels use a transparent polymer instead of glass.
Bifacial solar panel efficiency in real-world conditions
Even though reflected light does not produce nearly as much electricity as direct sunlight, it can still generate a meaningful amount of energy. Bifacial solar panels can produce roughly 5% to 30% more energy per panel than single-sided traditional panels depending on environmental conditions.
Factors that influence bifacial gain include:
For example, installations above white gravel, snow-covered ground, or light-colored roofing materials typically produce higher rear-side gains than systems installed above dark asphalt or shingles.
That said, you might find a use for bifacial panels if you have an off-grid solar setup. Bifacial panels can help harvest additional energy when panel space is limited or when maximizing daily energy production is important for battery charging.
Installation variables that affect bifacial module performance
The efficiency of bifacial solar panels is influenced by the type of panel you choose, the height at which they're mounted, the reflectivity of the surface below, and whether your system uses solar tracking technology.
-
Solar panel type: Monocrystalline panels typically deliver the highest conversion efficiency, while polycrystalline panels are slightly less efficient in most conditions.
-
Mounting height: Elevating your bifacial panels above the roof or ground allows more sunlight to reach the surface below and reflect upward toward the rear cells.
-
Surface reflectivity: Light-colored surfaces like white roofing membranes, gravel, sand, or snow can reflect significantly more sunlight than darker materials.
-
Tracking: Solar tracking systems allow panels to follow the sun across the sky throughout the day. Manufacturers like NEXTracker and Array Technologies produce single-axis trackers that can increase total energy production in large solar installations.
Comparing bifacial solar panels vs monofacial systems
While bifacial solar panels offer higher energy generation per panel, they’re often larger, pricier, and require more installation work than single-sided panels. This can make them less practical for many residential rooftop systems.
| Factor | Bifacial Solar Panels | Monofacial Solar Panels |
|---|
| Light absorption | Absorbs light from both front and rear sides | Absorbs light only from the front side |
| Energy yield | Typically 5–30% higher depending on surface reflectivity and installation design | Standard yield based on front-side irradiance |
| Backsheet | Transparent or dual-glass to enable rear-side light capture | Opaque (often white or black) |
| Albedo effect | Uses reflected light from ground surfaces | Does not capture reflected irradiance |
| Installation types | Works best with ground mounts or elevated systems | Commonly installed on residential rooftops |
| System Cost | Typically 15–20% higher upfront cost | Lower upfront system cost |
| Performance in snow | Rear-side production may continue when snow reflects sunlight beneath panels | Output decreases if the front surface is covered |
| Soiling loss impact | Rear generation can partially offset front-side soiling losses | Performance depends entirely on front surface cleanliness |
| Weight and structure | Often heavier due to dual-glass construction | Typically lighter modules |
| Tracking system benefit | Works well with solar trackers in large installations | Less additional benefit from tracking systems |
| LCOE (cost efficiency) | Higher energy yield can reduce cost per kWh over time in optimized installations | Lower upfront cost but standard energy output |
| Use case | Utility-scale solar farms, reflective surfaces, open ground mounts | Residential rooftops and small commercial systems |
Levelized cost of energy (LCOE) estimates are commonly calculated using:
LCOE = Total lifetime cost / Total lifetime energy output
Higher energy production from bifacial modules can reduce LCOE in installations where rear-side irradiance significantly increases total generation.
Disadvantages of bifacial solar panels
The additional energy-generating potential of bifacial solar panels is an attractive selling point. However, there are several downsides to consider, especially in residential applications.
-
Cost: Bifacial panels tend to cost about 15% to 20% more than monofacial panels.
-
Energy needs: Many residential rooftops already produce sufficient electricity with standard monofacial panels, so the additional cost of bifacial panels may not provide proportional energy gains unless installation conditions are optimized.
-
Installation: Installing bifacial solar panels often requires more structural clearance, specialized mounting hardware, and careful system spacing to maximize rear-side sunlight exposure.
-
Appearance: Because bifacial panels are often mounted higher above the roof or ground, they can be more visible than traditional rooftop panels.
-
Roof surface: Bifacial panels perform best when mounted above light-colored surfaces that reflect sunlight efficiently. Many residential roofs use darker asphalt shingles designed to absorb heat rather than reflect light, which reduces potential rear-side gains.
Bottom line on bifacial photovoltaic panels
There’s no denying that bifacial solar panels are an impressive advancement in photovoltaic technology. However, their value depends heavily on installation conditions.
For many residential homes with dark roofing materials and limited mounting clearance, monofacial solar panels can often produce similar energy output at a lower upfront cost.
Still, bifacial solar panels can be an excellent option for specific applications. Large commercial buildings, solar farms, or installations built above reflective surfaces may see meaningful improvements in total energy production compared with traditional monofacial systems.
As solar technology continues to evolve, bifacial modules are expected to play a growing role in utility-scale solar generation worldwide.